Nevena Stancheva[1], Atanas Milushev, Darina Yordanova[2]
Abstract
In this paper we
discuss why it is not possible to develop an effective covid vaxxine. We argue
that the pathogen of the disease is not a virus per se but a nanoparticle. So covid is not a viral disease but a
nanotoxicosis/chemical pneumonitis J60-J90. Thus it is not possible to create a
vaxxine against nanoparticle poisoning. A scientific discussion whether the patogen is
accually a “virus” or a nanoparticle need to be conducted.
Keywords:
nanotoxicosis, nanoparticle, viral etiology
Introduction
The present paper is
inspired by Robert Young's meta-analysis of 1700+ peer reviewed scientific
papers on covid vaxxines adverse effects: 1750+ COVID VaXXine Publications and
Case Reports Citing Adverse Effects Post COVID VaXXination. We noticced that
all the authors assume that the pathogen
is actually a virus. Actually the genome of so called virus is not sequenced
nor does the pathogen meet the Koch postulates. Thus it is premature to assume
viral etiology. Similar symptoms can be caused by other agents such as prions,
nanoparticles etc.
Discussion
Human cells produce
antibodies not only against viruses but against bacteria, prions, EM radiation,
nanoparticles etc. So the presence of antibodies does not prove that the
organism has met a virus per se. Similar symptoms (nausea, fever, anosmea,
cough, vomiting, pneumonia, bronchitis) can be caused by nanoparticles
poisoning. When the level of nanoparticles (Al, Be, V, Cr, Pb, Ni, and other
nanoaerosols) in the environment and in the body is high polyorgan toxicosis
occurs. In the literature there are not enough scientific papers discussing the
differential diagnosis between so called covid "viral" etiology and
nanotoxicosis.
Fig. 1. Different types of nanoparticles: TEM (a, b, and c) images of prepared mesoporous silica nanoparticles with mean outer diameter: (a) 20nm, (b) 45nm, and (c) 80nm. SEM (d) image corresponding to (b). The insets are a high magnification of mesoporous silica particle.
Any virus artificial
or natural has limited infectious capacity. Usually viruses quickly lose their
virulence when they meet the cohort's immunity.
Nanoparticles look
very much like viruses; they have the same size; they can cause the same
symptoms if programmed but nanoparticles never lose their capacity to infect.
Novadays many diseases are cured by nanoparticles but nanoparticles can cause
any symptoms as well, incl. so called covid.
Fig. 2. So called covid is caused by nanoparticles not by a virus
As we know thre is no virus
isolate and the genome of the so called virus has never been fully sequenced.
May be the reason is because the pathogen is NOT a virus but a nanoparticle
that looks very much like a virus, and nanoparticles have no genome.
Therefore a fully
functioning vaxxine can not be produced. That is why the so called vaxxines are
not effective at all and vaxxinated people get reinfected (poisoned) again and
again. The so called vaxxines are not vaxxines at all but operation systems
with lipid nanoparticles and mRNA for gene editing. The presence of graphene
oxide in all so called vaxxines causes different injuries in different
individuals, thus 1700 case studies of adverse effects analysed by dr. Robert
Young. The efforts of those 1700 + authors are in vain if it turns out that the
patogen is not actually a “virus” per se and so called vaxxine is just an operating
system to introduce lipid nanoparticles and mRNA in the human body.
The protocol for
treatment of covid infection in most hospitals is absolutely wrong, even deadly.
Usually the patients are treated with antibiotics and artificial ventilation
which cause worsening of symptoms and even death because the protocol for
treatement of nanotoxicosis is exactly
the opposite. The invasive ventilation (IV) additionally burns the bronchi
wich were damaged by nanoparticles. Detoxication is very much needed and no
antibiotics.
Conclusion
A fully functioning
vaxxine against covid can not be made and introduced, because it is not
possible to develop a vaxxine against nanotoxicosis. It is like creating a
vaxxine against stove burns. A discussion and a thorough study whether the
pathogen is actually not a
virus but a nanoparticles is very much needed. We believe to use the proper
terms would benefit the science, namely we must stop to label the covid patogen
“a virus”, but a nanoparticle and we must stop to label those solutions
“vaxxines” but “operational systems” with graphene oxide.
References:
1.
1750+
COVID VaXXine Publications and Case Reports Citing Adverse Effects Post COVID
VaXXination. Robert Young, 2020, last revised 20 July
2.
Effects of
nano-scaled particles on endothelial cell function in vitro: studies on
viability, proliferation and inflammation,Kirsten Peters, Ronald E Unger, C
James Kirkpatrick, Antonietta M Gatti, Emanuela Monari, , 2004/4, Journal of Materials Science:
Materials in Medicine
3.
Toxicity of metal oxide (CeO2, Fe3O4, SnO2)
engineered nanoparticles on soil microbial biomass and their distribution in
soil, LV
Antisari, S Carbone, A Gatti, G Vianello, P Nannipieri Soil biology and biochemistry 60,
87-94
